Saturday, February 18, 2017

Gowlland Tod Park

Gowlland Tod Provincial Park is situated near Victoria on the east side of a deep fjord called the Finlayson Arm. On the west side is the mountainous section of highway known as the Malahat that connects Victoria to the rest of Vancouver Island. It is in the Coastal Douglas Fir zone, the ecosystem with the lowest percentage area protected in British Columbia. Dry hilltops in the park are home to rare moss and wildflower sites of national significance.

Sustainable Trails: The environmental footprint in parks is much associated with trails. Sustainable trails are an important part of protecting natural conditions in a park or protected area.Leading conservation agencies such as the US National Parks place emphasis on sustainable trails to reduce the environmental footprint.  A sustainable trail has minimal impact on natural conditions and sensitive sites. It is free from erosion and provides a safe walking surface as well as views and points of interest that motivates hikers to stay on the trail.  

Assessment of trail sustainability in Gowlland Tod Park.

The Ridge Trail that runs from the south end of the park is sustainable but in need of maintenance. This trail provides users with good viewpoints to the fjord and gives a good appreciation of the landscape.

Trails on Jocelyn Hill in the middle of the park and the Timberman Trail that runs north eastward from Jocelyn Hill have many issues with unsustainable trail sections as shown on the map:

Poor location and strategic routing of the main trails in the park are the source of the problem. This part of the park is also zoned for a higher level of protection so the problems are significant. On Jocelyn Hill the main trails make a big zig-zag and this prompts users to make short cuts and trample over rare moss and wildflower sites. These sites are of national significance and a considerable area has been degraded. Sections of steep trail on the hill are suffering accelerated erosion and this makes them doubly unsustainable and unsafe.
The Timberman Trail has poor strategic routing. It follows a somewhat inland route that does not give users good views or appreciation of the fjord landscape. The inland routing also puts it in conflict with rare moss and wildflower sites. Users go onto these open sites in search of views that are not available from the trail. Since the Timberman trail lacks sufficient interest, users have pioneered un-designated trails shown on the map by impact notations. An un-designated trail near the Cal Revelle Nature Reserve held by the District of the Highlands is compromising the objective of no human access in the reserve.

To achieve its inland routing the Timberman Trail climbs steeply from the Pease Creek bridge across a very steep slope at excessive gradients upwards of 20%. This section is suffering severe accelerated erosion. The trail is unsafe and gives a white water hiking experience during rain storms.

Man caused accelerated erosion is an ongoing environmental disturbance that has no place in a protected area or park. Eroding trails need to be permanently deactivated and rehabilitated.  Frequent cross drains are dug across the steep eroding trail. Diverting water flow and removing foot traffic is usually enough to encourage natural rehabilitation and re-vegetation. The unsustainable trail is replaced with a sustainable trail with a reduced gradient of 12% to 15 %. The following map outlines a sustainable rerouting for the Timberman Trail. It meets US National Parks sustainable trail standards and provides users more viewpoints, points of interest and a better appreciation of the fjord landscape. It is a safe sustainable trail. Deactivation and rehabilitation of the existing trails will stop the degradation of natural conditions owing to the impacts outlined on the above map.
An improved solution was found for Jocelyn Hill as shown on the drawing:

This solution involving a one half kilometer relocation will enable the rehabilitation of almost three kilometers of unsustainable trails from Jocelyn Hill. The more direct route will end the excessive overland trampling that is degrading sensitive sites.

Gowlland Tod Park is one of the most sensitive parks in British Columbia. Since it is located near Victoria increasing use is to be expected. The existing unsustainable trail system is degrading natural conditions and compromising the protection of the park. Rehabilitation of the unsustainable trails and construction of the sustainable proposed routes will protect the park and provide users with safe trails with greater interest and appreciation of this unique landscape.

Sunday, November 6, 2016

American Keen Durand hiking shoes comparison with top European hiking footwear

After wearing European hiking shoes and boots for several years, I tried a pair of Keen, Durand hiking shoes. Their general specifications were similar to high quality European hiking shoes:

  1. Polyurethane (PU) mid-soles. This material adds to the durability of the shoe and is superior to EVA mid-soles. EVA mid-soles feel softer and more comfortable than the harder polyurethane when you try them on in the store, but after a long hike your feet will feel better on polyurethane.
  2. Good thick sole with deep tread.
  3. Quality leather upper.
How do the American Keen, Durand hiking shoes compare with the European shoes after 2,500 kilometers of use?
  1. The body of the shoe and especially the arch support remains in as new condition after considerable use. Some of the European manufacturers are going for reduced shoe weight and have compromised on arch support. The Keen Durand shoes had superior arch support that has been maintained after considerable use.
  2. Toe room in the Keen shoes enables toes move in shoe. This can help to increase stability if you like to press down with toes on rough trail sections. European shoes tend to be narrow and bind toes.
  3. The Keen shoes do not use Vibram soles like many of the European shoes. However, the material used by Keen provides better grip on wet rock and wood in the rain forests of the Pacific northwest. After 2,500 kilometers of use the tread of the sole is about half worn. This equals the European shoes with the advantage of better grip.
  4. The leather upper has good quality leather and it is standing up to wear and tear and winter use in the Pacific northwest as well as European shoes.
American Keen Durand hiking shoes are as good as top quality European shoes and are to be recommended. My favorite feature in European hiking shoes is glove leather lining now found only in a select few shoes. While you might expect glove leather lined shoes to be hot in summer, the glove leather absorbs moisture and keeps the feet dry and blister free. Keen Durand shoes have a durable synthetic liner, but the option of glove leather lining would make a very good shoe into a leader.

Saturday, October 8, 2016

Truck Loggers BC: Contractor sustainability

Truck Loggers, an organization of forest contractors in British Columbia has been a robust male enclave for most of its history, but it now has a woman president. Jacqui Beban realizes that the economic sustainability of forest contractors is tied to the sustainability of forest dependent communities. The Truck Loggers Association differs from most other forest sector organizations. Most other organizations represent central interests that are headquartered in big cities rather than the hinterland forest communities. Forest dependent communities and forest contractors have felt the pinch in recent years and Jacqui wants to reverse the trend by setting aside the old paradigms and eliminating the box entirely. The box is the legal and institutional framework for the management of public forests in BC. The Truck Loggers have supported the status quo, but now have a leader that wants to eliminate the box to achieve forest contractor sustainability.

Forest contractor sustainability is about sustainable forests and also about sharing the wealth that is derived from sustainable forest management. When times get tough, forest contractors are expected to shoulder more than their fair share of austerity, keep welding aging equipment and hope that they can remain solvent. They are at the bottom of any trickle down of surplus wealth from public forests.

The box works against forest contractors in many ways. Stewardship of public forests is arranged around rights to harvest public timber held by forest corporations. There two major problems with this arrangement. First, rights to harvest timber are not a sensible foundation for sustainable forest management. Rather, some arrangement based on responsibility for sustainable stewardship is needed to prevent future timber supply problems that result from greed for harvest in the short term. The box is already experiencing these timber supply problems. The box is a central arrangement for disposition of surplus wealth from public forests. The BC Government takes its cut of the surplus in the form of log stumpage charges. In tough times,the government reduces its take to buffer the surplus wealth taken in in the form of forest corporation profits. This buffering does not extend to the forest contractor. The buffering arrangements of government administered timber prices is viewed by trading partner countries as a subsidy and the the forest contractor can get further squeezed by the negative impacts of lumber export duties, tariffs and taxes.

To eliminate the box, Jacqui Beban will need to encourage her members to an about face that sees the Truck Loggers become an advocate for new legal and institutional arrangements that devolve responsibility for forest stewardship from central BC Government to communities. It will mean an end to harvesting rights and progress toward local institutions that are entrusted with long term sustainable stewardship of forest resources. The Truck Loggers have been progressive in encouraging First Nations participation in forestry employment. Aboriginal title has been defined by the Supreme Court of Canada as a community trust to ensure the sustainability of natural resources for present and future generations. The inside the box thinking is that First Nations will exercise this stewardship by consultation with the existing framework for resource allocation, such as harvesting rights in public forests. Aboriginal title needs its own institution to ensure sustainability. Responsibility for stewardship needs to be devolved from the Province to a trust that has registered professional managers and an elected board. The same arrangement could apply to forest dependent communities through the formation of local forest trusts.

The local forest trust would operate as a business that would sell logs on an open market. Forest corporations could not gain harvesting rights in local forest trusts. Professional forest managers would plan and operate the forest with the services of local forest contractors. Non-timber forest economic activities in minor forest products and recreational and tourist enterprises would also be encouraged. The central purpose of a forest trust would be to sustain the local forest to realize multiple economic and social benefit for the local communities. Forest contractor sustainability would be a central part of the deal. Jacqui Beban wants to ensure that the Truck Loggers are "in it for the long run". Truck Loggers can play a key role in ensuring there is a long run for forestry in BC

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Minnie Mouse or Donald Duck for President of USA

How will the forests of British Columbia be affected by the race for President of USA?  USA has been the major market for British Columbia softwood lumber exports. Although there is a free trade agreement between Canada and USA softwood lumber has been subject to export taxes or tariffs. When mature timber supplies in USA recovered in the later part of the 20th Century, lumber trade issues surfaced. US lumber producers argue that lower cost public timber supply of Canadian producers is an unfair advantage. The softwood lumber agreement, involving taxes, tariffs or quotas is up for renewal.

Meanwhile, a US presidential race is in full swing and perhaps the only usual feature of this years race is that the nominees have wealth and or celebrity. Otherwise the race has been unusual with venting of much steam generated by a pressure cooker of social and economic inequality. Neither candidate may be up to the task of defusing the underlying tensions in the country. An unstable USA would not be good for Canada.

Trade agreements have been a major issue in the Presidential primaries owing to the loss of US manufacturing jobs to other countries. Donald on the right of the political spectrum seems to be favoring pure protectionism. Bernie Saunders on the other hand, points out that existing free trade agreements favor corporations and enable them to operate or move to countries that offer low wages, limited social programs or weak environmental regulations. The issue is the fairness of trade and its affects on the average person.  USA has already identified unfairness in the arrangements that hand over most of BC's public forests to forest corporations that pay administered prices rather than market prices for public timber. Export taxes or tariffs have resulted. The present vulnerability to these taxes could be removed by making communities rather than forest corporations the beneficiaries of public forests in BC. Local trusts with professional managers would provide stewardship to local forests and timber or logs would be sold a market prices. The local trusts would also manage the forests for multiple social, environmental, and economic benefits so no valid argument could be made that these values are being compromised to reduce timber costs.

While Bernie Sanders may not become President of USA, the ideas of the Bernie Sanders movement may grow and influence future events. Political discourse in USA has always divided on the ideas of limited government versus big government. Government and the state are confused or seen by some as the same. In a democracy, the government protects or represents the people from the power of the state. Good government does that! However, throughout the democratic western world, corporations or large economic entities have been favored by governments.  The state and corporations have become closely aligned in a new system of corporate feudalism that is not questioned. The public forests of British Columbia have been managed under such a system. The winds of change have started to blow.

The public forests of British Columbia were instituted on winds of change that blew from USA. Gifford Pinchot, the advocate for National Forests in USA also advised a BC Royal Commission on forests in 1909 that recommended public public forests. National or public forests embodied the idea of the greatest good to the greatest number.  

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Forest Practices Board questions self regulation by forest companies

 A Forest Practices Board report on District Manager's Authority questions self regulation by forest companies under the concept of professional reliance. Use link to get to the Forest Practices Board Reports.

Friday, December 18, 2015

Proportional Representation and a Green Canada

Recently,Canada has had a change in Government and the governing Liberal Party promised some form of proportional representation. This is also supported by the New Democratic Party and the Green Party. There are several forms of proportional representation and any form that Canada selects may pose a problem for Canada's environment. Even the present first past the post method of representation carries the same problem.

When we talk of proportional representation, we mean proportional to the population that live mainly in cities strung across the south of Canada. About half of Canada's population live in a few big cities. Our larger cities tend to be ports, transportation, supply, financial, and political centers for a economy that is based on natural resources usually located in the hinterland. Canada's forests are a major carbon sink or repository for the world. Our forest laws and policies for forests that tend to be public rather than private have favored grand scale timber supply that favor the business of the big city while ignoring the sustainability of individual forest dependent communities. Proportional representation will not solve the problem of big cities depleting the hinterland.

The power of cities is reflected in our culture. Before 1900 the average person would have understood the meaning of character, but the notion of personality would be new and little understood. The notion of personality, style, merits of extrovert behavior, celebrity increased through the 20th century as cities grew and became centers for new technology and media. The growth of cities has had a profound effect on human culture. Are these changes in our culture and perspectives good for our relationship with the land and nature outside our built cities?  Will our children that are heavily occupied looking at the screens of various electronic devices have a feel for the farm or forest?

Will the votes from the city ever represent Canada? Proportional representation in Canada needs to include some mechanism that is proportional to the area of Canada. Canada is a vast country and our different regions, areas and environments need representation. There are cultural differences within Canada that are a product of regional environments. Our founding fathers saw the Canadian Senate as the representative of different areas. Western Canada was barely in the picture at that time, and the non elected appointee Senate has declined in stature as a credible institution. Canada is a tenuous country and a reformed elected senate that represents areas or regions could help to hold the country together in the long term.

While there is considerable support for proportional representation, our politicians are unwilling to tackle proportional representation of regions or areas because it will involve the Provinces and constitutional reform. Too difficult the politicians say. Are our politicians being too lazy. An elected Senate could improve the long term stability of our tenuous country.

Provinces in Canada have considerable powers, more than most federal systems. The flow of natural resources from the hinterland is what makes the big cities, financial and political centers of Provinces tick. A major pipeline intended to move Alberta oil or bitumen south to the Gulf of Mexico has been denied by USA. If Canada or the other provinces restricts the flow of Alberta oil to the east or west, Alberta will have the motivation to leave the Canadian federation.

Canada needs some representation proportional to area in Ottawa. A reformed elected Senate could be the necessary institution. Such a Senate would represent the land and the natural environment and ensure that our political system is not dominated by voices from the built environments of the city.

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Forestry, Recreation and Tourism in BC's public forests

British Columbia's public forests are managed through a system of private timber harvesting rights.
Industrial timber production takes priority and sustaining other values is seen as an imposition on timber activities.
After a binge through the best virgin timber in the last half of last century, the forest sector is less robust and more sensitive to cost pressures and unlikely to be progressive in the stewardship of non-timber values and resources.
The Montreal Process an international agreement makes it clear that sustainable forest management means including non timber and nature based economic activities in the forest economy.
Only approximately 25% of the average public forest landscape in BC is suitable for timber production. The remaining 75% is wilderness in natural condition with considerable recreation potential. This area of wilderness is twice as large as the area protected in parks.
The wilderness areas in timber producing forest landscapes and the protected areas in BC Parks are lands in natural condition with recreational potential. Land in natural virgin condition is in short supply in the world. BC has barely scratched the surface of the sustainable nature based economy that could be generated from these lands that make up more than half the area of the Province. Aesthetic values have been reduced in some areas as a result of industrial timber management.
The Montreal Process calls for legal and institutional arrangements that support comprehensive sustainable forest management. Given that the recent mountain pine beetle epidemic was, in large part, a $100 Billion forest management failure, it can be argued that the timber harvesting rights system has failed to ensure timber sustainability. It has done a poor job of managing other values and made our forest products vulnerable to discriminatory export duties.
British Columbia's potential for non-comsumptive nature based economic activity is greater than Switzerland. Switzerland's tourist economy is valued at US $20 Billion. This is larger than BC's forest economy. BC's private harvesting rights in public forests impedes the development of nature based resources and economic activity. BC Parks, the management authority for protected areas is unfunded and lacking professional capacity.
Development of forest recreation resources should be sustainable. While other jurisdictions have standards for safe sustainable forest trails, poorly located unsustainable trails are the rule rather than the exception in BC. Serious accelerated erosion can be found on trails in BC Parks.
New legal and institutional arrangements are required for sustainable management of public forests in BC. These arrangements should focus on stewardship responsibility rather than private rights. The stewardship institution should have the mandate to manage all the natural capital of a forest landscape. The stewardship institution should be accountable to the local public.
The local forest trust is a promising forest stewardship institution. Trusteeship of public forests would be devolved from the BC Government and would replace the existing failed institutions. The local forest trust would have a democratically elected board and professional forest managers charged with sustainable management of all forest resources. The forest managers would contract harvesting operations and sell the timber on an open market. They would also be responsible for the protection and development of recreation and other resources. Recreation business activity could take place through stewardship licenses.  A more long term forest design approach would be employed to sustain all forest values and there would be a major shift away from the present short term piecemeal planning that is associated with forest harvesting and its grudging accommodation of other interests. Forestry treatments would become more diverse and as a result the health, aesthetics and timber sustainability of the forest landscape will improve.

British Columbia's public forests are managed by harvesting rights that are held by forest companies. The public interest in recreation is handled through professional reliance. Professional foresters are supposed to ensure that environmental and recreational values are sustained and protected in any forest management plans. Most forest professionals probably do their best to accommodate other forest values and interests. However, the entire legal and institutional framework for managing public forests is stacked against a more proactive approach toward the development and protection of recreational resources.
Timber is king in BC's forests and this false economic hegemony has pushed other interests to the side because they are not seen as producing big dollars. The tourism economy in BC is significant and could be much enhanced by some investment and development in forest recreation. Forest companies with timber harvesting rights operate on timber dollars and accommodating other interests and values is viewed as an imposition or a constraint on timber activities. Professional foresters are hired or employed by forest companies and are subject to the pressures to reduce timber harvesting and forest operating costs. The timber harvesting binge through the best of BC's virgin timber in the last half of last century has left a situation where forest operating cost pressures are greater than any time in the last seventy five years. Cost pressures are likely to impede progress in stewardship of non-timber values.
Where does recreation and tourism fit in sustainable forest management?
This depends on your definition of sustainable forest management. Sustainable forest management is touted by the BC Government and forest corporations. Some of the sustainable forest management certification schemes have a timber centric definition of sustainable forest management with other interests being accommodated by advisory groups and public opportunities to comment. These align with the approach of the BC Government and forest corporations toward the management of other forest values and interests. Public involvement processes can easily become a public relations effort to appease the public with no real commitment, dollars or effort going into the protection development and enhancement of non-timber resources or values.
The Montreal Process, an international agreement and definition of sustainable forest management signed by Canada makes it clear that recreation and tourism does fit within sustainable forest management. Sustainable forest management is about generating multiple social and economic benefits to meet the needs of forest dependent communities. Sustainable forest management is about generating economic value from timber and then adding other social and economic benefits from the natural capital of the forest landscape.
Further, the Montreal Process makes it clear that a forest jurisdiction such as the Province of British Columbia should have a legal and institutional framework that enables the type of comprehensive sustainable forest management that it defines.
The potential for forest recreation and associated nature based economic activity in British Columbia is an untapped major economic opportunity. Switzerland's mountains, forests and scenery attracts a tourism economy of US$ 20 Billion annually (more than our timber economy). BC has more to offer and greater potential.
A forest dependent community seeking to enhance its tourism economy by developing the recreational potential of its forest landscapes will be impeded rather than aided by the institutional framework for forest management. A forest company or forest company will see the landscape as its operating forest and the proposed recreational developments as a bit of a nuisance.
Forestry and recreation in the average forest landscape in BC under the present framework
Politicians, especially at times of elections invite us all to partake in a sort of voluntary tyranny of the economy. The economy looms so large that it distorts our perceptions. Our perception of the average public forest landscape has been similarly distorted. Timber economics looms large and most of us see timber growing and harvesting as the dominant feature of the landscape. Only about one quarter of the area of the average forest landscape in BC is suitable for timber production. The remainder of the area is inaccessible or uneconomic forest, alpine areas, lakes glaciers and mountain tops that will remain in wild natural condition. This area of de-facto parks is about twice the area of our officially designated protected areas or parks. The last two decades have seen a considerable increase in the area of public forest that has been placed in parks or protected areas. Pressure from environmental groups to "save" forests from forest management was the motivating force for designating more parks. Society was seen to have made an economic sacrifice and there were calls from the forest sector to designate timber producing forests as "working forests" or places where growing timber could take place without the constraints of other interests or values. Polarized political land use and economic arguments between environmentalists and forest corporate interests have distorted our perceptions of the real need to provide sustainable stewardship to forest landscapes. These perceptions have emanated from big cities and are being imposed to the detriment of forest dependent communities. The polarized debate over forest management did promote improvement in forest practices. Erosion associated with forest roads in timber producing forests was much reduced. Meanwhile there is egregious soil erosion ongoing on trails in "saved" forests or protected areas because BC Parks lacks similar standards, budget and trained staff capacity.
The area that comprises BC's forest recreational resource, the protected areas or parks and the land that will remain in natural condition within timber producing forest landscape is getting little stewardship under our existing framework. Meanwhile there is pressure toward a timber producing or "working forest" approach in the timber producing area. Timber producing areas can also offer considerable recreational opportunity if a long term forest design approach makes accommodations for other values. The present forest stewardship plans are really only relatively short term plans for harvest and forest regeneration with other values seen as a constraint requiring some work around approach.
Forest recreation is poorly accommodated within the present framework for managing public forests. Efforts to prop up our existing arrangements, designed for 1945, are likely to be regressive with respect to protecting and developing recreational values. In 1980, the Ministry of Forests had a recreation section with professional capacity in forest recreation. This capacity no longer exists and the cost pressures in forest harvesting have increased. Forest contractors are being squeezed by forest corporations and there is less stability in the forest sector. There may be increased discriminatory tariffs and taxes on forest product exports to USA because their lumber producers can make convincing arguments that the BC framework  is not market based and subsidizes forest companies. BC forest products get extra taxes because BC's system is too lenient. The US forest products producers could argue that BC is not doing enough to sustain other values and failing to pay the costs of their protection is a subsidy. Our forest products could face extra taxes because we are not doing enough to sustain recreation and other forest values. The BC Government's revenue stream from stumpage will reduce and this will put pressure to reduce administration costs through long term leasing of public forest land for corporations to have a relatively free hand in mono focused timber growing. The population of BC is becoming more concentrated in southern cities easing the way for politicians to advocate robbing the hinterland for the sake of the economy.
Government and forest corporation public relations efforts will point to a future of improvement in the accommodation of recreational values and development in BC's forest landscapes. However, the present situation in the forest sector indicates that we will face a regressive period with regard to the stewardship of recreation and other non-timber forest values.
New legal and institutional arrangements are needed to safeguard recreation and other non timber values in BC's public forests
Today, we like to talk about ecosystem forest management. Actually the idea that forests should be managed more along the lines of natural indigenous forests has been around for a long time. Foresters were advocating this approach almost two centuries ago. The main argument was that more natural forests are less likely to have major failures or blips in their ability to sustain timber supplies. "Work with nature or you will be defeated" was the dictum of foresters that opted for the natural approach.
BC has just experienced one of the most serious blips in the history of forest management. The mountain pine beetle epidemic caused lost economic opportunity to the tune of about $100 Billion. The public relations machine would have us believe that global warming is the sole culprit. The main species involved is Lodge Pole Pine. European foresters have been growing this BC tree as an exotic species and know it should be harvested before it gets too old. Too old for this species is about 80 years because it becomes susceptible to mountain pine beetle attack at that age. In BC, harvesting other species was favored and government forest fire fighting efforts saved more Lodge Pole pine from fire. The net result was that the interior of BC became filled with old Lodge Pole pine. Our forest management arrangements for public forests created a huge area of prime mountain pine beetle habitat ready and waiting for a mild winter or two. Since BC is on the Pacific shores a couple of mild winters can be expected without help from global warming. Our legal and institutional framework, based on the notion that forests can be sustainably managed by the vehicle of harvesting rights has failed to sustain timber supplies and resulted in major economic losses. It is not good for the timber economy and it has been a major impediment to the protection and development of recreation and the non-timber forest economy.
What should we learn from this? In forest ecosystem management we should see ourselves as part to the ecosystem. A major item in how we interact with the forest ecosystem is our legal and institutional arrangements for managing our public forests. The public as owners have given up their forests to a system of private harvesting rights that has had negative impacts on the forest and its timber production capacity while riding roughshod over other forest values. These are ecosystem and public values. We need a new system that works for the forest ecosystem and the public instead of corporate greed.
We need to start thinking of our forest values not as a right but as a responsibility. We have to be good stewards of the forest and our legal and institutional arrangements should ensure stewardship. The stewards should not be corporate folk with a right to harvest, but independent professional stewards charged with comprehensive sustainable management of all the natural capital of the forest landscape. These stewards should be accountable to the owners of the forest. In BC the owners are the public. The trustee for the public has been the BC Government and for over a century it has failed to adequately exercise its duty to the public as beneficiaries of our forests and values. Its forest and environmental agencies are failed institutions. Even if you have a warm feeling about the considerable increase in parks or protected areas, the management authority, BC Parks, is perhaps the most capacity and budget deficient of the agencies involved in public forests.
A new approach of devolving trusteeship of public forests from the Provincial Government to local forest trusts under trust documents requiring sustainable forest management as defined by the Montreal Process is the a promising arrangement. There would be a locally elected board and professional managers charged with sustaining all forest values. The forest managers would plan and conduct timber operations with the aid of contractors. Timber would be sold on the open market. The forest managers would also be responsible for planning and managing other forest resources. Recreation or nature based economic operations would operate under stewardship licenses. The professional forest managers would work for all interests and would be accountable to the public through a democratically elected board. The local trust approach provides for stewardship of all resources rather than private timber harvesting rights with the hope that the harvesters will accommodate and care for other values. The polarized reaction to industrial timber harvesting activity in British Columbia is a product of the deficiencies or inability of the harvesting rights system to accommodate other values. This has distorted public perception about forest management and stewardship. Forest management should include stewardship of recreational values.
The local forest trust approach would provide professional forest stewards that would plan and develop recreational values. A long term forest design approach could be employed rather than simply trying to reduce impacts of piecemeal harvesting plans. The lack of social license for timber harvesting in BC has brought the view that all forest harvest is bad while protection in parks or other non timber activity is good. The reality is that all activity in forests requires good stewardship. Poor forest roads, recreation trails, ski runs can cause erosion. Good stewardship and planning can prevent these problems. Good stewardship is the product of comprehensive education and experience. A forest engineer will have training and experience in forest roads that is transferrable to the task of adequate location and construction of hiking or other trail in the forest. Use of clear cutting, shelter wood or selection silvicultural systems can be used in a forest design to sustain recreation, wildlife or recreational values. Under a new system with professional forest stewards charged with sustaining all forest resources, forest management can be the means to sustain recreational resources. Under the present system of harvesting rights and the hegemony of industrial timber harvesting in the forest landscape there is limited opportunity to exercise the protective potential of good forest stewardship in the protection and development of recreational values. The local forest trust could also be the institution for stewardship of aboriginal title. Aboriginal title is already defined by the Canada's supreme court as a sustainable community title.

The development and protection of recreational values in public forests in BC
There is both a social and economic component to the protection and development of recreational values in forests. Nature based economic activity is generated through various diverse recreational activities such a hiking, hunting, guiding, skiing etc. There are social, spiritual, and health benefits in forest recreation.
Recreational development in forests to bring significant economic return to a local economy do not need to involve some major project requiring large capital investment. The natural capital is in the natural conditions and scenery in the forest landscape. A good system of hiking trails may be sufficient to supply recreational opportunity to locals and attract visitors and tourists. Sometimes these can be constructed by local volunteers at minimal cost. However, trails need to be adequately routed, located and designed to be sustainable and attract use and tourists. Gradients of trails should not exceed 15% to provide ease of hiking and reduce the risk of erosion. They need to provide viewpoints and other points of interest along the route. Sensitive site should be avoided. The tread or trail surface should be free of tripping hazards such as projecting rocks or roots. Humans are barely evolved to stay upright, and if you hike regularly on a trail with tripping hazards there is a very high chance that you will suffer an injury within one year. A considerable amount of planning and location effort is a prerequisite for a recreational trail system that will be sustainable and attract users and tourists. Other jurisdictions that aim to attract tourists provide high quality hiking trails. Forest trails in BC, even those in protected areas, tend to leave more than a little to be desired. Landscapes that are marred by poorly planned industrial timber operations leave a bad impression on visitors.
There are boundless opportunities for recreation in BC's forests but we will not advance in the protection and development of these resources and values until we reform our legal and institutional arrangements for managing public forests.

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Forestry in Recreation Areas Conference Kelowna BC Saturday November 7, 2015

Conference Notice:
Forestry in BC’s Recreation Areas  Improving Relationships and Results
Holiday Inn, West Kelowna, BC 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM Saturday, November 7, 2015
Goals of the conference
 The main purpose of the conference is to better understand the issues with forest harvesting practices near important recreation and tourism areas in BC, and discuss possible solutions. These discussions will be documented to ensure the ideas brought forward can be used as a resource by conference participants in their future discussions with the forest industry and government.   The discussions will be summarized and made accessible to all attendees during and after the conference. Information will be compiled in the following ways.  o PowerPoint slides and other presentation material will be uploaded to Google Docs. o A laptop-equipped note taker will be assigned to each of workgroup.   o Notes will be uploaded to Google Docs for easy collation and sharing.  As part of the “Next Steps” session, participants may decide that it is appropriate to form a volunteer team to take the raw conference results and create a more formal document.  The document could summarize recreation stakeholder concerns about forest management and practices within recreation and tourism areas, along with any agreed upon recommendations for government and industry actions.  The goal would be to improve working relationships and consideration of recreation values in forest harvesting and management.
Conference Organization and Charter
This exploratory conference has been organized by the Apex Property Owners Association and volunteers concerned about forest management practices within recreation and tourism areas across BC.
We hope to identify issues, and share experiences while seeking the maximum benefit for the participants’ time and effort: a biggest bang for the buck approach.  Unfortunately, it has been our experience that government and industry do not give much weight to the opinions of individual citizens. Therefore, for this initial conference, participation is restricted to official representatives of BC’s outdoor recreation and tourism oriented communities, organizations and clubs.  Hence participants will typically be elected board members of an outdoor recreation
association or non-profit organization.  Property owner associations and local community officials of recreation-oriented communities are also invited to participate.
The number of participants is limited by the facilities, so conference attendees must register by Friday, October 23.  We reserve the right to refuse participation to anyone who does not qualify under the conference charter described above.  
Conference Registration
$50 per person will be collected to cover conference facilities and Saturday’s food & beverages.   Click here to register and submit payment
Participants are responsible for their own travel and accommodation costs.
The West Kelowna Holiday Inn is offering a special rate of $90/night for conference participants.  Please contact the hotel directly at 250-768-8879.
For more information about the conference agenda, contact:
Jeff Brown Chair, Forestry Advisory Committee Apex Property Owners Association Ph. 240-461-9337
For conference rooms/logistics questions, contact:
Lyndie Hill   Ph. 250-490-6084  
Conference Agenda
Session Topic Participants Time  Continental Breakfast  8:30 – 9:00 Intro Opening Remarks:   Why are we here? Jeff Brown 9:00 – 9:30
Identifying the Issues: Stakeholders will summarize their: 1) concerns with current forestry practices in recreation areas, and  2) their experience with the current stakeholder consultation process
Workgroups1 9:30 – 10:30
Coffee Break:    Participant networking    Collation of workgroup results2
 10:30 – 11:00
Issues Presentation of Results: Presentation, Q&A, Clarification Workgroup Facilitator 11:00 – 12:00  Lunch  12:00 – 12:30 Solutions Overview: Current forest regulation and practices Jeff Brown 12:30 – 1:00
Exploring Possible Solutions: Stakeholders will summarize what is working and opportunities for improvement
Workgroups 1:00 – 2:30
Coffee Break:    Participant networking    Collation of workgroup results
 2:30 – 3:00
Solutions Presentation of Results: Q&A, Discussion
Workgroup Facilitator 3:00 – 3:30
Next Steps
Where to from here: Brainstorming Consensus building Volunteers for Action leadership
All 3:30 – 4:30
Next Steps
A Future Action Plan Together:  Summary of Next Steps Call to Action
Jeff Brown 4:30 – 5:00
Social Participants are encouraged to organize an informal Saturday evening social event.
Those staying overnight in Kelowna
5:00 - ?:??
Notes: 1. Each workgroup will be assisted by a laptop-equipped note taker. 2

Sunday, October 4, 2015

Canada's election; forests and the green economy

Canada's election campaign is a horse race between Conservatives, Liberals and The New Democratic Party (NDP).  The latter two parties are toward the social democratic end of the political spectrum and their splitting of the vote may allow the Conservatives to retain leadership with only approximately 30% of the popular vote. Any party has time to squeeze into the leading position for the vote in about two weeks.

All the parties are working hard to attract votes. One of the big issues is transportation infrastructure for commuters in large cities. Eighty percent of Canadians live in cities, so politicians are eager to capture votes from cities. Most of the parties are making some noise about different schemes to reduce carbon emissions. There is also some talk about Canada trying to do more in the way of value adding instead of shipping raw resources out the door for the fastest possible dollar. The NDP have promised some funds to increase forestry jobs but otherwise forests have received little attention in the campaign.

 Canada is a huge country and  no one seems to be asking why most of the population is crowded into southern cities that get so congested that high cost rapid transit is needed. Canada's natural resources are located in the hinterland but these big cities are the financial, supply, transportation or port centers for the resource economy. Many resource dependent communities barely have sidewalks while the cities tend to be better appointed and more attractive to most. Cities that feel entitled and have the votes to exercise their entitlement will continue to be a force toward a " rob the hinterland " type of economy. This outlook has not been good for sustainable stewardship of forests or the most effective use of other natural resources.

Canada has a Green party and it is looking to increase its seats in Parliament. Other parties are making green talk about reducing carbon emissions and renewable green energy. Canada's best contribution toward global climate stability is maintaining healthy forests. The largest terrestrial carbon stock on the planet is contained in boreal forests. It is greater than tropical forests and Canada has about 30% of the world's boreal forests.

Perhaps the greatest flaw in Canadian democracy is that it represents the people in cities and the greater area of our geography has little place or standing in our system or way of thinking. Canada has an upper house called the Senate. It is a mirror of the House of Lords in the Westminster system of government. It is populated by appointees, mainly political hacks, that relish a good expense account. An elected senate could represent area, the geography of the country and in so doing would give greater voice to Minorities such as First Nations and French speaking people.

Sunday, July 12, 2015

Truck Loggers search for sustainability

The Truck Loggers Association has been a force for change in BC forestry. It is a forest contractor association that has been vocal about it's members being financially squeezed by major forest corporations. Their Truck Logger BC magazine contains regular grumbling about this problem and nothing much has changed for their members. Contractors have taken the brunt of recent difficulties in the forest sector.

The summer 2015 issue re-frames the issue as one of contractor sustainability. This is probably an effective avenue toward a solution. They draw on definitions from the 1987 Brundtland Commission to support their concept of contractor sustainability. Adequate compensation for work done in the forest enables the contractor to invest in new and innovative equipment and maintain a safe stable work force. This enables efficient forest operations and better environmental protection. The forest and forest dependent communities benefit from stability and sustainability. The Truck Loggers have a winning argument.

The Truck Loggers Association view is supported in an international forest sustainability agreement called the Montreal Process. Criterion 6 of that agreement has several indicators that match their views. The "distribution of revenues derived from forest management" is a central concern of Truck Loggers and is the heading of indicator under Criterion 6. While the Montreal Process supports contractor and community stability, it also takes a comprehensive view of all aspects of forest conservation and sustainable forest management. Good stewardship for ensure forest health, productivity, stable soils, good water quality are covered. Truck Loggers will understand that these are vital for contractor sustainability.

The final Criterion of the Montreal Process concerns the legal and institutional arrangements that support sustainable forest management. We do not tend to think that these are very important. Also we tend to accept our Provincial arrangements without much question or analysis. British Columbia's Crown forests were retained in public ownership to ensure their sustainable management. The foundation is very strong but some of the structures we have built on top of the foundation were designed for post WWII economic expansion and have since resulted in some sustainability problems. The legal arrangements for managing public forests should involve responsibilities for sustainable stewardship. However, we try to manage forests in BC under rights to harvest. Forest corporations hold or control most of these rights. Forest contractors get squeezed because they are little guys working for the big timber rights holders. Truck Loggers do not want to bite the hand that feeds but they need to realize that without some change in this core issue, their lot will not improve in the future.

Aboriginal title is a change agent. We think hat aboriginal title can somehow be absorbed or co-opted under the present arrangements for forest management. Aboriginal title is not compatible with our present arrangements because it is a more advanced concept. It is not an ownership concept but a delegation of responsibility to a community group to sustain the land and forest for the benefit of future generations. Aboriginal title needs its own legal and institutional arrangements. There is the need for some democratic elected board that represents the community and professional resource managers that can plan and manage for sustainability. A local community based sustainable forest trust is much more likely to place priority on contractor sustainability than a large forest corporation.
The concept of the community based sustainable trust in Aboriginal title is one that has wider application to all forest dependent communities in British Columbia. Contractor sustainability, the goal of the Truck Loggers, would be on a much stronger foundation under local sustainable trusts than under the present arrangements.